Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

High Speed CMOS Differential Logic Design for Carry Lookahead Adder

Yogeshwaran Kandasamy

Abstract


Growing need for portable devices has provoked ever increasing concern on energy efficient design. Since the energy consumption of modern digital CMOS circuits has been traditionally dominated by switching energy having quadratic dependence on supply voltage, voltage scaling is an effective way to minimize the overall energy consumption of system-on- chip. This brief describes a novel low-voltage CMOS differential logic operating with supply voltage approaching the MOS threshold voltage. The proposed logic style improves switching speed by boosting the gate–source voltage of transistors along timing-critical signal paths. The logic style also minimizes area overhead by allowing a single boosting circuit to be shared by complementary outputs. Test sets of logic gates were designed in a 0.18-μm CMOS process, whose comparison results indicated that the energy–delay product of the proposed logic style was improved by up to 86% compared with conventional logic styles at supply voltage ranging from 0.4 to 1.2 V. The experimental result for a 4-bit adder designed using the Microwind tool shows that proposed carry lookahead adder results in low power consumption compared to ripple carry adder, 64-bit adder design can be implemented in VHDL and synthesized using the proposed logic style based Xilinx ISE with an addition time of 4.8 ns at 0.5- supply, energy 31 pJ at 100 MHz.

Keywords


Carry Lookahead Adder (CLA), Boosted CMOS Differential Logic (BCDL), Low Power, Low Voltage, Voltage Boosting.

Full Text:

PDF

References


M. Pedram and J. M. Rabaey, Power-Aware Design Methodologies. Boston, MA: Kluwer, 2002.

A. Wang and A. Chandrakasan, “A 180 mV FFT processor using subthreshold circuit techniques,” in Proc. IEEE ISSCC, 2004, pp. 292–295.

B. Zhai, L. Nazhandali, J. Olson, A.Reeves, M. Minuth, R. Helfand, P. Sanjay, D. Blaauw, and T. Austin, “A 2.60 pJ/Inst subthreshold sensor processor for optimal energy efficiency,” in Proc. IEEE VLSI Symp., 2006, pp. 154–155.

D. Bol, D. Flandre, and J.-D. Legat, “Technology flavor selection and adaptive techniques for timing-constrained 45 nm subthreshold circuits,” in Proc. ACM ISLPED, 2009, pp. 21–26.

L. G. Heller,W. Griffin, J. Davis, and N. Thoma, “Cascode voltage switch logic: A differential CMOS logic family,” in Proc. IEEE ISSCC Dig. Tech. Papers, Feb. 1984, pp. 16–17.

R. H. Krambeck, C. M. Lee, and H.-F. S. Law, “High-speed compact circuits with CMOS,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. SSC-17, no. 3, pp. 614–619, Jun. 1982.

J. H. Lou and J. B Kuo, “A 1.5V full-swing bootstrapped CMOS large capacitive-load driver circuit suitable for low-voltage CMOS VLSI,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 119–121, Jan. 1997.

J. H. Lou and J. B. Kuo, “A 1.5-V CMOS all-N-logic true-single-phase bootstrapped dynamic-logic circuit suitable for low supply voltage and high-speed pipelined system operation,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II, Analog Digit. Signal Process., vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 628–631, May 1999.

J. Garcia, J. A. Montiel-Nelson, and S. Nooshabadi, “A single-capacitor bootstrapped power-efficient CMOS driver,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II, Exp. Briefs, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 877–881, Sep. 2006.

J.-W. Kim and B.-S. Kong, “Low-voltage bootstrapped CMOS drivers with efficient conditional bootstrapping,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II, Exp. Briefs, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 556–560, Jun. 2008.

Jong-Woo kim, Joo-Seong kim and Bai-Sun kong,”low voltage CMOS differential logic style with supply voltage approaching device threshold,”IEEE Trans.CircuitsSyst.l,Exp.Briefs,volumeno.59,no.3,pp.173-177,March2012.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.