Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Sentimental Analysis of Twitter Feed

Ruchi Madhusudan Marwal, Rashmi Deshmukh

Abstract


Sentimental analysis is the way to identify whether the given tweet is positive, negative or neutral. Sentimental analysis is used in different fields like politics, company level and many more. It is also referred to as opinion mining. It takes tweet as input and gives the output based on its scoring module.

Here we try to understand its uses and all of its architecture [1], [2].


Keywords


Opinion Mining, Sentimental Analysis, Evaluation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Twitter as a Corpus for Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining, Alexander Pak, Patrick Paroubek.

S. Asur and B. A. Huberman, Predicting the future with social media," in Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology - Volume 01, WI-IAT '10, (Washington, DC, USA), pp. 492{499, IEEE Computer Society, 2010.

L. Bing, Sentiment Analysis: A Fascinating Problem, pp. 7{143. Morgan and Claypool Publishers, 2012.

Methodology for Twitter Sentiment Analysis Olga Kolchyna1, Th_arsis T. P. Souza1, Philip C. Treleaven12 and Tomaso Aste12 1 Department of Computer Science, UCL, Gower Street, London, UK, 2 Systemic Risk Centre, London School of Economics and Political Sciences, London, UK.

International Journal of Innovative Research in Advanced Engineering (IJIRAE) Issue 1, Volume 2 (January 2015) Sentiment Analysis on Twitter Data Varsha Sahayak Vijaya Shete Apashabi Pathan BE (IT) BE (IT) ME (Computer) Department of Information Technology, Savitribai Phule Pune University, Pune, India.

Sentiment Analysis on Twitter with Stock Price and Significant Keyword Correlation Linhao Zhang Department of Computer Science, The University of Texas at Austin

Alec Go, Lei Huang, Richa Bhayani Twitter Sentiment Analysis.

G. Adda, J. Mariani, J. Lecomte, P. Paroubek, and M. Rajman. 1998. The GRACE French part-of-speech tagging evaluation task. In A. Rubio, N. Gallardo, R. Castro, and A. Tejada, editors, LREC, volume I, pages 433–441, Granada, May.

Ethem Alpaydin. 2004. Introduction to Machine Learning (Adaptive Computation andMachine Learning). The MIT Press.

Hayter Anthony J. 2007. Probability and Statistics for Engineers and Scientists. Duxbury, Belmont, CA, USA.

Kushal Dave, Steve Lawrence, and David M. Pennock. 2003. Mining the peanut gallery: opinion extraction and semantic classification of product reviews. In WWW ’03: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on World Wide Web, pages 519–528, New York, NY, USA. ACM.

Alec Go, Lei Huang, and Richa Bhayani. 2009. Twitter sentiment analysis. Final Projects from CS224N for Spring 2008/2009 at The Stanford Natural Language Processing Group.

Bernard J. Jansen, Mimi Zhang, Kate Sobel, and Abdur Chowdury. 2009. Micro-blogging as online word of mouth branding. In CHI EA ’09: Proceedings of the 27th international conference extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, pages 3859–3864, New York, NY, USA. ACM.

John D. Lafferty, Andrew McCallum, and Fernando C. N. Pereira. 2001. Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In ICML ’01: Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 282–289, San Francisco, CA, USA. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.

Christopher D.Manning and Hinrich Sch¨utze. 1999. Foundations of statistical natural language processing. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Bo Pang and Lillian Lee. 2008. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Found. Trends Inf. Retr., 2(1-2):1–135.

Bo Pang, Lillian Lee, and Shivakumar Vaithyanathan. 2002. Thumbs up? sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. In Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 79–86.

Ted Pedersen. 2000. A simple approach to building ensembles of naive bayesian classifiers for word sense disambiguation. In Proceedings of the 1st North American chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics conference, pages 63–69, San Francisco, CA, USA. Morgan Kaufmann.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.