Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Comparative Study of FCM, ARKFCM, K-Means and PSO Based Algorithms for Segmentation of Thyroid Nodules

D. Poornima, Dr. Asha Gowda Karegowda, J. Ranjitha

Abstract


A thyroid nodule is an abnormal cell growth in the thyroid gland and seems as a palpable or non-palpable mass. Thyroid nodules are very frequent in clinical practice. Most thyroid nodules are benign, and only a small portion (5%-10%) of nodules are malignant. At present, high resolution ultrasonography is the principal imaging modality for diagnosing and classifying benign and malignant nodules. In order to visualize anatomic structures (tissues, body organs, nodules) of interest from medical images, segmentation plays an indispensable role. Precise segmentation of organs would allow accurate measurements, simplify visualization and, consequently, make the diagnosis more reliable. The aim of this study is to compare the performance of Fuzzy C-Means (FCM), K-means, Particle Swam Optimization (PSO) and Adaptive Regularized Kernel Fuzzy C-Means (ARKFCM) based segmentation techniques for accurate delineation of nodules using clinical thyroid ultrasound images. Preprocessing is carried out to remove speckle noise and to achieve better segmentation results. The results of these segmentation algorithms are analyzed based on six performance metrics Peak Signal to Noise Ratio (PSNR), Mean Square Error (MSE), Structural Similarity Index (SSIM), Normalized Cross Correlation (NCC), segmentation accuracy and time taken for segmentation. Experimental evaluation revealed that, PSO and ARKFCM segmentation algorithms outperformed compared to k-means and FCM algorithms.


Keywords


Benign Thyroid Nodule, Malignant Thyroid Nodule, Image Segmentation, Speckle Noise, Performance Metrics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Dougherty G. Digital Image Processing for Medical Applications. Cambridge University Press, 2009.

Endocrineweb. http://www.endocrineweb.com/endocrinology/overview-thyroid Date accessed: 25/05/ 2018.

American Thyroid Association. http://www.thyroid.org/thyroid-nodules Date accessed: 25/05/2018.

Sharma N, Aggarwal L.M. Automated medical image segmentation techniques. Journal of Medical Physics. 2010, 35(1), pp.3-14.

Koon-Pong Wong, “Medical Image Segmentation: Methods and Applications in Functional Imaging”, Handbook of Biomedical Image Analysis. 2005, pp.111-182.

Engr.Chijindu VC, Inyiama HC, Engr. Uzedhe G. Medical Image Segmentation Methodologies – A Classified Overview. African Journal of Computing & ICT, 2012, 5(05), pp. 90-98.

Dzung Pham L, Chenyang Xu, Jerry Prince L. Current Methods in Medical Image Segmentation. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering. 2000, 2(1), pp. 315-337.

Fatma El-Zahraa Ahmed, El-Gamal, MohammedElmogy, AhmedAtwan, “Current Trends in Medical Image Registration and Fusion”, Egyptian Informatics Journal, 17(1), 2016, 99-124.

Poornima D, Asha Gowda K. A Review of Image Segmentation Techniques applied to Medical Images. International Journal of Data Mining and Emerging Technologies, 2018, 8(1), pp. 78-94.

Dimitris E. Maroulis, Michalis A. Savelonas, Dimitris K. Iakovidis, Stavros A. Karkanis, Nikos Dimitropoulos, “Variable Background Active Contour Model for Computer-Aided Delineation of Nodules in Thyroid Ultrasound Images”, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 2007, 11(5), pp. 537-543.

Matilda Landgren, Niels Christian, Overgaard, Anders Heyden, “A Measure of Septum Shape using Shortest Path Segmentation in Echocardiographic Images of LVAD Patients”, International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 2014, pp. 3398-3403.

Dimitris K. Iakovidis, Michalis A. Savelonas, Stavros A. Karkanis, Dimitris E. Maroulis, “A Genetically Optimized Level Set Approach to Segmentation of Thyroid Ultrasound Images”, Applied Intelligence, 2007, 27(3), pp. 193-203.

Xiaohao Cai, Raymond Chan, Serena Mnrigi , Fiorella Sgallari, “Vessel Segmentation in Medical Images using a Tight Frame based Algorithm”, SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, 2013, 6(1), pp. 464-486.

Dorin Bibicu, Luminita Moraru, Anjan Biswas, “Thyroid Nodule Recognition Based on Feature Selection and Pixel Classification Methods”, Journal of Digital Imaging, 2013, 26(1), pp.119–128.

Eystratios G Keramidas, Dimitris K. Iakovidis, Dimitris Maroulis, Stavros Karkanis, "Efficient and Effective Ultrasound Image Analysis Scheme for Thyroid Nodule Detection", International Conference on Image Analysis and Recognition, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007.

Yen-Ting Chen, Chun-Ju Hou, Min-Wei Lee, Shao-Jer Chen, Yao-Chuan Tsai, Tzu-Hsuan Hsu, “The Image Feature Analysis for Microscopic Thyroid Tissue Classification”, 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2008, pp. 4059-4062.

Zulaikha Beevi, Mohamed Sathik, “A Robust Segmentation Approach for Noisy Medical Images Using Fuzzy Clustering With Spatial Probability”, International Arab Journal of Information Technology, 2012, 9(1), pp. 74-83.

Wilmington Endocrinology. http://wilmingtonendo.com/image-gallery Date accessed 10/04/2017.

Digital Database Thyroid Image. http://www.cimalab.unal.edu.co Date accessed 10/04/2017.

Rafael Gonzalez C, Richard Woods E. Digital Image Processing. 4th Edition. Pearson, 2017.

Singh A, Yadav S, Singh N. Contrast enhancement and brightness preservation using global-local image enhancement techniques. Parallel, Distributed and Grid Computing (PDGC), Fourth International Conference, Waknaghat, India, 2016, pp. 291-294.

Pugazhenthi A, Singhai J. Automatic centroids selection in K-means clustering based image segmentation. Communication and Signal Processing, International Conference, Melmaruvathur, India, 2014, pp. 1279-1284.

Nilesh Bhaskarrao Bahadure, Arun Kumar Ray, Har Pal Thethi, “Image Analysis for MRI Based Brain Tumor Detection and Feature Extraction Using Biologically Inspired BWT and SVM”, International Journal of Biomedical Imaging, 2017, pp. 1-12.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.