Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

A Hybrid Feature Extraction Approach for Mammogram Mass Analysis

B. Surendiran, Dr. A. Vadivel

Abstract


This paper focuses on characterizing the spatial structure of mammogram masses using various hybrid features. According to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) spatial benign and malignant masses can be differentiated using its shape, size and density, which is how radiologist visualizes the mammograms. Based on BIRADS mass shape characteristics, benign masses tend to have round, oval, lobular in shape and malignant masses are lobular or irregular in shape. Measuring regular and irregular shapes mathematically is found to be a difficult task, since there is no single measure to differentiate various shapes. Various new geometrical shape and margin features like eccentricity, Elongatedness, dispersion, circularity were introduced to characterize the morphology of masses. This approach uses 20 hybrid features like 17 shape/margin/texture features and DDSM database descriptors like density, assessment, subtly. A Univariate Analysis Of Variance (ANOVA) Discriminant Analysis (DA) classifier is used for classifying spatial structure of mass either as benign or malignant. The study shows the contribution of shape and DDSM descriptors in discriminating benign and malignant masses. Experiments have been conducted on benchmark Digital Database for Screening Mammography (DDSM) database. The experimental results shows that proposed approach performs superior using hybrid features compared to unimodal features for mammogram mass classification.


Keywords


DDSM Descriptors, Discriminate Analysis, Hybrid Features, Mammogram Mass Classification, Shape and Margin Features

Full Text:

PDF

References


N. C. I. , “Cancer stat fact sheets: Cancer of the breast”, available at http://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/breast.html ( Accessed April 2011).

American Journal of Roentgenology ,” Computer-aided Detection Improves Early Breast Cancer Identification”, http://www.ajronline.org. [accessed on Mar 2011]

Zhang, Zhiyong, Lu, Joan and Yip, Yau Jim, “Computer aided mammography”, In: Proceedings of Computing and Engineering Annual Researchers' Conference 2008: CEARC‟08. University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, 2008, pp. 125-130.

American College of Radiology, “Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS), breast imaging atla”,. 4th ed., Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 2003.

B.Verma, P.McLeod, A.Klevansky, “A novel soft cluster neural network for the classification of suspicious areas in digital mammograms”, Pattern Recognition, v.42 n.9, 2009, p.1845-1852.

R. F. Brem, J. K. Baum, M. Lechner, S. Kaplan, S. Souders, L. G. Naul,J. Hoffmeister., “Improvement in sensitivity of screening mammography with computer-aided detection: a multiinstitutional trial”, Am Journal Roentgenology, AJR 2003, vol 181, p 687–693.

L.Hadjiiski ,B.Sahiner, H.Chan , “Advances in computer-aided diagnosis for breast cancer”, Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol.18, 2006, pp. 64-70.

L.Vibha, G.M.Harshavardhan, K.Pranaw, P.Deepa Shenoy, K.R.Venugopal, L.M.Patnaik, “Classification of Mammograms Using Decision Trees”, In: 10th International Database Engineering and Applications Symposium (IDEAS'06). Pp.263-266 IEEE , 2006.

X.Zhang, X.Gao, Y.Wang, “MCs Detection with Combined Image Features and Twin Support Vector Machines”, Journal of Computers, Vol. 4(3), 2009, pp. 215-221.

H.D. Cheng, X.P. Cai, X.W. Chen, L.M. Hu, X.L. Lou, “Computer-aided detection and classification of microcalcifications in mammograms: A survey”, Pattern Recognition 36 (12), 2003, pp. 2967–2991

J. Shi, B. Sahiner, H-P Chan, L. Hadjiiski, "Breast Mass Classification on Full-Field Digital Mammography and Screen-Film Mammography," International Workshop on Digital Mammography (IWDM), LNCS 5116, pp.371-377, Tucson, AZ 2008.

P.L.Rosin ,Classification of pathological shapes using convexity measures, Pattern Recognition Letters, 30 , 2009,pp. 570–578

C.E. McLaren, W.P. Chen, K. Nie and M.Y. Su, Prediction of malignant breast lesions from MRI features: a comparison of artificial neural network and logistic regression techniques, Acad. Radiol. 16 (2009), no. 7, 842-851

M.J. Islam, M. Ahmadi, M.A. Sid-Ahmed, “An Efficient Automatic Mass Classification Method In Digitized Mammograms Using Artificial Neural Network”, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Applications (IJAIA), vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 1–13, Jul. 2010

M.M. Eltoukhy, I.Faye, B.B. Samir, “A comparison of wavelet and curvelet for breast cancer diagnosis in digital mammogram”, Computers in Biology and Medicine, Elsevier, vol.40, 2010. pp.384–391.

V. Shah, L. Bruce, N. Younan ,“Applying Modular Classifiers To Mammographic Mass Classification”, Proc. of the IEEE Eng. in Medicine and Biology Society, vol 3, pp. 1585 – 1588, San Francisco, California, 2004.

A.Retico, P.Delogu, M.E,Fantacci, P.Kasae, “An automatic system to discriminate malignant from benign massive lesions on mammograms”. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, 569(2) , 2006, pp. 596-600.

R.M. Rangayyan, F.J. Ayres, J.E.L. Desautels, “A review of computer-aided diagnosis of breast cancer: Toward the detection of subtle signs”, Journal of the Franklin Institute, 344(3-4), 2007, pp. 312-348.

B.Surendiran , A.Vadivel , Y.Sundaraiah, “Classifying Digital Mammogram Masses Using Univariate ANOVA Discriminant Analysis”, ARTCom 2009,IEEE computer society, 2009, pp. 175-177.(Best Paper Award)

C. Rose, D. Turi, A. Williams, K. Wolstencroft, and C. Taylor, „Web services for the DDSM and digital mammography research‟, IWDM, Lecture Notes in Computer Science,Springer, Berlin, vol. 4046, 2006,pp.376–383.

I.Christoyianni, A.Koutras, E.Dermatas, G.Kokkinakis, “Computer aided diagnosis of breast cancer in digitized mammograms”, Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, 2002. 26(5): p. 309-319.

M. Heath, K. Bowyer, D. Kopans, R. Moore, and P. J. Kegelmeyer. “The Digital Database for Screening Mammography”, In Proc. International Workshop on Digital Mammography, p. 212–218, 2000.

D.Kopans, “Breast Imaging”, J.B. Lippincott Co., Philadelphia, 1989.

B.Surendiran ,A.Vadivel, “Mammogram Mass Classification using Various Geometric Shape and Margin Features for Early Detection of Breast Cancer”, International Journal of Medical Engineering and Informatics (IJMEI), Inderscience, 2011.(to be published).

A Rojas and A K Nandi, “Detection of masses in mammograms via statistically based enhancement, multilevel-thresholding segmentation, and region selection”, Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, Volume 32, Issue 4, June, 2008, pp. 304-315.

R.C.Gonzalez, R.E.Woods, S.L.Eddins, "Digital image processing using MATLAB", New Jersey, USA, Prentice Hall; 2004.

B.Surendiran, A.Vadivel, “A Hybrid Classifier for Mammogram Mass Classification using Various Geometric Shape and Margin Features”, Special Issue on : Rapid Manufacturing in Medical Applications, International Journal of Rapid Manufacturing, Inderscience, 2011.(submitted for publication).

A. Oliver, J. Freixenet, R. Marti, J. Pont, E. Perez, E.R.E. Denton, R. Zwiggelaar, “A novel breast tissue density classification methodology”, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, Vol. 12, No.1, 2008, pp. 55-65.

B.Verma, “Novel network architecture and learning algorithm for the classification of mass abnormalities in digitized mammograms”, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, vol. 42, no. 1, 2008, pp. 67-79.

R.O.Duda ,P.E.Hart, D.G.Stork, “Pattern Classification”, John Wiley, second edition, 2001.

M.R.M. Samulski, “Classification of Breast Lesions in Digital Mammograms”, Master Thesis, 2006.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.