Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Work Stress Management of Management Faculty at Colleges in Tamilnadu

G. Alex Rajesh, Dr. O. M. Haja Mohideen

Abstract


Management faculty exposed to a high level of deliverables from the higher education institutions or schools create an enormous work stress on them. Author feels improper handling of such work stress leads to many personal, physical, social, physiological and economical problems soon. The paper aims to understand the root cause of work stress, building of work stress and management of work stress so that the impact of work stress can be reduced to a minimal or zero level by the management fraternity. Thepaper exclusively deals with the work stress problems of management faculties who is a generalist and expected to do the specialist work assignment. The management faculties are different from the other subject faculties in terms of their working environment. The average age of such faculties throughout the globe is around 25 to 35 years. The expectations of deliverables from the management faculties in the view of stakeholders are very high. The proofs of many management practices are not available. The faculties find it difficult to assume many variables and explain the same to the students. The average knowledge level of the present well informed internet students are very high as compared to the faculty makes it more work stressful to the teachers. More over the subject of management is relatively very young in terms of teaching. The subject of management became an important teaching subject only after the Second World War (1939 to 1945) and industrial revolution. The management gurus themselves keep upgrading their concepts to make the subject more vibrant. In this framework the Author would like to examine the various aspects of work stress and its impact on the management faculties and how best it can be overcome.


Keywords


Management Education, Work stress Management, Management Faculties, Business Schools, Work stress Impact

Full Text:

PDF

References


Brouwers, A. & Tomic, W. (2000). A longitudinal study of teacher burnout and perceived self-efficacy in classroom management. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16 239-253.

Burke, R. J. & Greenglass, E. R. (1989). Psychological burnout among men and women in teaching: An example of the Cherniss model,Human Relations, 42(3), 713-719.

Byrne, J. J. (1998). Teacher as hunger artist: Burnout: It’s causes,effects and remedies. Contemporary Education 69(2), 86-91.

Cano, J. (1990, June). Teacher Stress – Teacher burnout: A profession at risk. The Agricultural Education Magazine, 62 13-14,22.

Cochran, W. G. (1977) Sampling techniques. New York: Wiley.

Davis, J. A. (1971) Elementary survey analysis. Englewood, NJ:Prentice Hall.

Freudenberger (1974). Burn-Out: The high cost of high achievement.Garden City, NY: Anchor Press.

Gold, Y. (1984) The factorial validity of the Maslach Burnout Inventory in a sample of California elementary and junior high school classroom teachers. Educational And Psychological Measurement, 44,1009-1016.

Golembiewski, R. T. (Ed. ). (1993). Handbook of organizational behavior. New York: Marcel Dekker.

Gough, P. B. (2000, November). Bring on the pachyderms. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(3),183.

Hall, K. & Savery, L. K. (1987), Stress management, Management Decision, 25(6), 29-35.

Harden, R. M. (1999) Stress, pressure and burnout in teachers, is the swan exhausted? Medical Teacher 21(3), 245-247.

Hobfall, S. E. , & Shirom, A. (1993). Stress and burnout in the workplace. In R. T. Golembiewski (Ed. ), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 41-60). New York: Marcel Dekker.

Iwanicki, E. F. & Schwab, R. L. (1981). A cross-validational study of the Maslach burnout inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41, 1167-1174.

Lee, J. S. (1990, November) How healthy are agriculture teachers? The Agricultural Education Magazine, 62(12). 6, 21.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.