Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Automatic Text Generations using Lexical Chaining

Dr.V. Shanthi, S. Lalitha

Abstract


Lexical chains are defined as clusters of semantically related words. For the Text Generation the lexical chain are very important and the lexical chains are created using the WordNet database. The aim of this paper is to finds the new relation such as statistical word associations for the lexical chaining process. The statistical word associations represents an additional type of lexical cohesive relationship that is not found in WordNet. The architecture also recognizes the gloss definitions which identifies the relations between two concepts not directly related.

Keywords


Lexical Chaining, Extended Wordnet, Statistical Word Association, Gloss Definition.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alemany.L, M. Fuentes. (2003) “Integrating cohesion and coherence for automatic summarization”, In theProceedings of the 11th Meeting of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (EACL-03).

Banko.M V. Mittal, M. Witbrock, (2000) “Generating Headline-StyleSummaries”, In the Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL-00).

Berger.A, V. Mittal, (2000) “OCELOT: a system for summarizing Web”, In the Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM SIGIR Conference of Research and Development in Information Retrieval, (SIGIR- 00), pp.144-151, 2000.

Barzilay (1997), “Lexical chains for summarisation”, Master‟s Thesis, Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel.

Cramer, Irene and Marc Finthammer (2008). “An evaluation procedure for word net based lexical chaining: Methods and issues”, In Proceedings of Global WordNet Conference.

Bo-Yeong Kang (2002) “Text Summarization through Important Noun Detection Using Lexical Chains” M.S. Thesis, Kyungpook National University.

Resnik (1999), “Semantic Similarity in a Taxonomy: An Information-Based Measure and its Application to Problems of Ambiguity”, in Natural Language.Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, (JAIR), Vol. 11, pp. 95-130.

Pedersen (1996), “Fishing for Exactness”, In the Proceedings of the South-Central SAS Users Group Conference (SCSUG-96).

Mihalcea, D. Moldovan (2001), “eXtended WordNet:Progress Report”, In the Proceedings of NAACL Workshop on WordNet and Other Lexical Resources, pp.95-100.

Xu, J. Broglio, W. B. Croft (1994), “The design and implementation of a part of speech tagger for English” Technical Report IR-52, Center for Intelligent Information Retrieval, Department of Computer Science, University of Massachusetts

Miller, C. Leacock, T. Randee, R. Bunker (1993), “A Semantic Concordance”, In the Proceedings of the 3rd DARPA Workshop on Human Language Technology, pp. 303-308.

Agirre, O. Ansa, E. Hovy, D. Martinez. (2000) “Enriching very large ontologies using the WWW”, In the Proceedings of the Workshop on OntologyLearning, 14th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI-00).

Allan, V. Lavrenko, R. Papka (1998) “Event Tracking”, Computer Science Department, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, CIIR Technical Report IR-128.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.