Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription or Fee Access

Learning Styles-Based Differentiated Instruction as Tool towards Academic Achievement of Grade Five Pupils in Science and Health V

Roni P. Sapad, Dennis G. Caballes

Abstract


Learning is a process which brings out change in the individual’s way of responding as an outcome of practice or other experience. It is also a process by which knowledge is obtained. Learning occurs when a person comes to know something previously unknown. The more learning is enriched when the factors of a learning environment are responsibly present. The educational principle suggests that pupils who are actively engaged in the learning process are more likely to achieve success. Once the pupils are actively engaged in their own learning process, they begin to feel empowered and their personal achievement and self-direction level rise.  This experimental study aimed to determine the effectiveness of learning styles-based differentiated instruction on the academic achievement of grade five pupils in Science and Health V of Timoteo Paez Elementary School in the Division of City Schools, Pasay City, Philippines for the school year 2014 – 2015. This study employed the randomized pre-test-posttest control group design. The data gathering instruments that was utilized were the VARK Learning Style Inventory and a validated teacher-made test. The data generated from the research instruments were recorded, analyzed, and interpreted using the weighted mean, standard deviation, One-Way Analysis of Variance, and Independent T-test. In the context of the findings of the study, the following conclusions and implications were drawn. Pupils have different learning styles; they may be Visual, Aural, Read/Write and Kinesthetic. The mean pretest scores of the control and the experimental groups were not significant. The academic achievement of the posttest of the pupils taught in Science and Health V using learning styles-based differentiated instruction was found to be significant. Likewise, the learning styles-based differentiated instruction is effective in developing the scientific abilities of the pupils. This implies that learning styles-based differentiated instruction is effective in improving academic standing of the pupils. Further, it is effective in improving the academic standing of the pupils. Recommendations were raised based on the findings of the study.


Keywords


VARK, Learning Styles, Differentiated Instruction, Pre-test and Posttest, Science and Health V.

Full Text:

PDF

References


McTighe, J. & Tomlinson, C. Integrating Differentiated Instruction and Understanding By Design: Connecting Content And Kids. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. (2006).

Gallardo, Rebecca M. “Congruent Teaching and Learning Styles Preferences Vis-à-vis Academic Achievement in Social Studies IV”. Unpublished Dissertation, Rizal Technological University, Mandaluyong, Philippines. (2009)

Pelayo, Rommel E. Achieving Equilibrium between Teaching and Learning Strengths in Secondary Physics”. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, The National Teachers College, Manila, Philippines. (May, 2007).

Lebar, O & Mansor, H. L. Pencapaian pelajar mengikut gaya belajar dan bentuk pentaksiran. Paper presented at the education seminar Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. Unpublished Presented Papers. (2000)

Ogena, Ester B, Lana, Ruby D, & Sasota, Randolf S. “Performance of Philippinie Science High Schools with Special Science Curriculum in the 2008 Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS-Advanced)”. Science Education Institute, Department of Science and Technology.) (2008)

De Leon, Hector S. The Philippine Constitution. (2005 Edition). Rex Printing Co. (2005)

Armstrong, A. M. Instructional Design in the Real World: A View from the Trenches. United States: Information Science Publishing (2004)

Dunn, R., & Dunn K. Practical Approach to Individualizing Instruction, New Jersey; Parker Division of Prentice Hall (2007)

Jantan, R., & Razali. Psikologi Pendidikan Pendkatan Kontemporari. Kual Lumpur: McGRaw Hill Education. (2002)

Fleming, N., & Baume, D. “Learning styles again: Varking up the Right Tree!” Educational Developments. SEDA Ltd, issue 7.4 Nov. (2006)

Yaakub, R., & Hashim, S. Psycholoy and Personality. Bentong: PTS Publications & Distributors Sdn. Bhd. (2004)

Mok S. S. Ilmu Pendidikan Untuk KPLI: Psikologi Pendidikan & Pedagogi. Jaya Subang. Kumpulan Budiman, Sdn. Bhd. (2003)

Drago, W. A., & Wagner, R. J. “VARK Preferred Learning Styles and Online Education.” Management Research News. (2004)

Ismail, I. M. Maklum balas pelajar lelalui gaya pembelajaran VARK terhadap pengajaran berasaskan computer (PBK). Unpublished master dissertation, Universiti Tun Hussein on Malaysia, Batu Pahat. (2010)

Fleming, N. D. V.A.R.K Visual, Aural/Auditory, Read/Write, Kinesthetic. New Zealand: Bonwell Green Mountain Falls (2006)

Fleming, N., & Baume, D. Learning styles again: varking up the right tree!, Educational Developments. SEDA LTD, Nov Issue (2006)

Thomas, L., Ratcliffe, M., Woodburry, J., & JArman, E. Learning styles and performance in the introductory programming sequence. ACM. (2002)

Murphy, R. J., Gray, S. A., Straja, S. R., & Bogert, M. C. “Student Learning Preferences and Teaching Implications: Educational Methodologies.” Journal of Dental Education. (2004)

Miller, B. A Review of the quantitative research on multigrade instruction. Research in Rural Education (2001)

Wolfman, S. and Bates, R. Kinesthtic leaning in the classroom. Journal of Computing Science in Colleges Retrieved from https://scholar.google.com.ph. (2005)

Carbonaro, W., & Gamoran A. the production of achievement inequality in high school English. American Educational Research Journal. (2002)

Tomlinson, C. Fulfilling the promise of the differentiated classroom: Strategies and tools for responsive teaching. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum (2004)

McTighe, J., & Brown, J. Differentiated instruction and educational standards: Is Détente Possible? Theory into practice; summer. (2005)

Dufour, R., Dufour, R., Eaker R., & Karhanek, G. Whatever it takes: how professional learning communities respond when kids don’t learn. Solution Tree. National Educational Service (2004)

Anderson, K. Tips for Teaching: Differentiating Instruction to Include All Students. Preventing School Failure (2007)

Batula, Maricil P. “The Effect of Experiential Learning Strategy on the Academic Performance of Grade IV pupils in Science and Health Grade IV”. Unpublished Master’s Thesis, The National Teachers College, Manila, Philippines. (2014)

Dimitrov, D. & Rumrill, P. Pretest-posttest designs and measurement of change. College of Education, Kent State University, Kent, USA. (2003)

Hagos, L., Delos Santos, A., & Lim, U. Utilizing Mobil Technology in Enhancing Teaching and Learning in Mathematics. INTI Journal: Special Issues on Teaching and Learning. (2009)

Gilakjani, A. P. Visual, Auditory, Kinesthetic Learning Styles and Their Impacts on English Language Teaching. Journal on Studies in Education. Retrieved from https://scholar.goole.com.ph (2012)

Fadel, C. Multimodal learning through media. What the research says. An Jose, CA: Cisco Systems. (2008)

Garner, Deborah C. “A Study of the Relationship between Perceptual Modality and Academic Achievement of Third Grade Students”. Unpublished Dissertation, The National Teachers College, Manila, Philippines. (May, 2006)


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.